CHECHEN TERRORISTS & THE NEOCONS

BY COLEEN ROWLEY

The revelation that the family of the two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombings was from Chechnya prompted new speculation about the attack as Islamic terrorism. Less discussed was the history of U.S. NeoCons supporting Chechen terrorists as a strategy to weaken Russia.


Coleen Rowley, retired FBI agent and former chief division counsel in Minneapolis.

I almost choked on my coffee listening to neoconservative Rudy Giuliani pompously claim on national TV that he was surprised about any Chechens being responsible for the Boston Marathon bombings because he’s never seen any indication that Chechen extremists harbored animosity toward the U.S.; Guiliani thought they were only focused on Russia.

Giuliani knows full well how the Chechen “terrorists” proved useful to the U.S. in keeping pressure on the Russians, much as the Afghan mujahedeen were used in the anti-Soviet war in Afghanistan from 1980 to 1989. In fact, many neocons signed up as Chechnya’s “friends,” including former CIA Director James Woolsey.

For instance, see this 2004 article in the UK Guardian, entitled, “The Chechens’ American friends: The Washington NeoCons’ commitment to the war on terror evaporates in Chechnya, whose cause they have made their own.”

Author John Laughland wrote: “the leading group which pleads the Chechen cause is the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (ACPC). The list of the self-styled ‘distinguished Americans’ who are its members is a roll call of the most prominent neoconservatives who so enthusiastically support the ‘war on terror.’

“They include Richard Perle, the notorious Pentagon adviser; Elliott Abrams of Iran-Contra fame; Kenneth Adelman, the former US ambassador to the UN who egged on the invasion of Iraq by predicting it would be ‘a cakewalk’; Midge Decter, biographer of Donald Rumsfeld and a director of the rightwing Heritage Foundation; Frank Gaffney of the militarist Centre for Security Policy; Bruce Jackson, former US military intelligence officer and one-time vice-president of Lockheed Martin, now president of the US Committee on Nato; Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute, a former admirer of Italian fascism and now a leading proponent of regime change in Iran; and R. James Woolsey, the former CIA director who is one of the leading cheerleaders behind George Bush’s plans to re-model the Muslim world along pro-US lines.”

Continue reading »

LYNNE STEWART & RALPH POYNTER ON “STEAL THIS RADIO”

Below is a link to a revised edition of my 2008 Steal This Radio show with Lynne Stewart & Ralph Poynter, updated to include Lynne’s current health crisis and the petition to release her from jail on compassionate grounds.

I am making this publicly available to for broadcasting, and for rallying listeners to sign the petition at http://lynnestewart.org.

The show is quite DIFFERENT than you might expect! CLICK HERE to download it, but BE CAREFUL — It’s 600mb as a WAV file and runs 58 minutes: 25 seconds, so only download it if you’re prepared to receive such a large file. And, if you’re planning to broadcast it, please let me know so I can get the word out.

Thank you!

Mitchel Cohen
Secretary, WBAI (99.5 FM in NYC) Local Station Board, and
Author, “What Is Direct Action: Lessons from (and to) Occupy Wall Street” (Preface by Richard Wolff) (596 pages). CLICK HERE for book.

DEBT AND/OR WAGES: ORGANIZING CHALLENGES

The following piece by George Caffentzis in the current issue of Tidal #4 (“Occupy Theory / Occupy Strategy”) is the first I’ve seen that examines the different forms of organization that a Debtors’ movement requires as opposed to a movement around wages (or trade unions).

As such, this is a very important document (which ends much too abruptly; probably poor editing involved by the Tidal staff).

I have written not quite a “response”, but further thoughts built on George’s article, which I include below, as well as several comments on it.

by GEORGE CAFFENTZIS

I work as a university teacher and most workers’ organizations I have been involved with (and studied) have struggled around wages and working conditions on the job. For example, my union (Associated Faculties of the University of Southern Maine) is now on a “work to rule” action over a wage dispute. But with my involvement with Strike Debt, however, I am now in a debtors’ organization. This is a new experience for me and for many others in Strike Debt. I thought that it would be helpful to sketch out quite schematically some of the many dissimilarities between the sphere of debt and that of wage struggles.

First, consider the ideological dimensions of wages and debt. Wages are supposed to be a “fair exchange” between the worker and the boss; the worker works for the boss for the agreed upon time, and s/he receives a fair monetary recompense. But in actual fact the value created by workers is far greater than their monetary wage; there is nothing “fair” about the “exchange,” which proceeds anyway because workers are propertyless and need to sell their labor power, or they starve. This asymmetry between boss and worker is not total, for the workers often refuse work in a thousand and one ways (going on strike, sabotaging production, “malingering,” etc).

Debt also has its ideological character. It, too, is supposed to be a “fair exchange,” between creditor and debtor. But in actual fact the creditor gains an interest payment (often many times the principal) and in so doing receives a return for the risk incurred. Refusal to pay back the loan plus interest is considered to be immoral and unfair. The debtor is made to feel ashamed, even to have committed a secular sin. Yet, increasingly, household debt (or “use value” debt, which is used to purchase commodities meant to satisfy needs and desires) is incurred in order to meet bask conditions for the reproduction of life (food, housing, education, health).

Continue reading »

GUEST POST: DARK-ZERO FEMINISM

Written two days after the nation-wide launch of ZERO DARK THIRTY; and
One day after the Golden Globe Awards

by ZILLAH EISENSTEIN
Distinguished Scholar, Ithaca College
http://zillaheisenstein.wordpress.com

(January 14, 2013 — Ithaca New York) The film starts with a black blank screen and the voices from people stuck in the trade towers on that fateful day, September 11, 2001. I thought to myself: this is a set up to make sure we are lost to the saddened memory of that day, and the stance that we were wronged—and that this film will right this wrong.

This trope did not work for me so the film did not work. I thought the story and its telling was corrupt. I thought it exposed U.S. thuggery with no critique of it. I thought it screamed the revenge narrative of post- 9/11/2001 with no regret, or hesitation, or ambiguity.

Continue reading »

PACIFICA’S WBAI RADIO STATION IN NEW YORK, SILENCED BY SANDY, IS BACK ON THE AIR

Station broadcasts during storm from evacuated Wall Street building until power is cut

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 2, 2012

Contact: Summer Reese
Chair and Interim Executive Director,
Pacifica Foundation
E-mail: summer@pacifica.org
Tel: (510) 849-2590

(New York City) The Nixon administration couldn’t do it. Neither could the Clinton or Bush administrations. But earlier this week, hurricane Sandy turned off the mics at WBAI, the historic Pacifica Foundation New York radio station that has been a listener-sponsored gadfly afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted since 1960.

WBAI’s General Manager, Berthold Reimers, reported that after the NYC transit system was shut down Sunday evening, a crew of seven WBAI producers and volunteers camped out at the station at its headquarters at 120 Wall Street so that they could continue round-the-clock live coverage of Hurricane Sandy, as Wall Street flooded 10 stories below them.

By Monday evening (October 29) the waters outside rose to the second floor of the 34-story building. Con Ed shut off the power — and along with it, the ability to broadcast from that location. Announcer Michael G. Haskins was able to continue broadcasting for several hours from a remote location, using equipment that had been purchased a year ago for that purpose.

Continue reading »

RED ALERT! CALL TO DEMAND SHUT DOWN OF INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, NOW!

They’ve shut the subways. They’ve shut the schools. They’ve shut the parks, tunnels and shortly the bridges. But the nuclear power generators at Indian Point, just 26 miles north of New York City? Those they’re keeping open.

This is insane!

Should the waters of the Hudson flood into the plant, that will be an utter disaster. Should any of the spent fuel rods stored in pools at Indian Point be washed into the Hudson, we can kiss New York City goodbye. (How’s that for an early morning TV show — “Goodbye, New York”?)

Continue reading »

TROPICAL STORM SANDY — Report by KPFA News (Berkeley) includes interview at end with Mitchel Cohen

Click here to listen to Sunday night’s news report from WBAI’s sister station, KPFA, on the West Coast.

 

 

OCTOBER 21, 1967 (45 YEARS AGO): STORMING THE PENTAGON

Forty-five years it’s been! In October 1967, I was 18 years old and beginning my third year at the State University of New York at Stony Brook, organizing students to participate in the first militant demonstration on the East Coast against the Vietnam war. At the Pentagon.

Singer-songwriter Phil Ochs — my hero, and a major artistic force within the antiwar movement — was scheduled to perform at Stony Brook the night of the big march. Many students were saying they wouldn’t go on the march because they wanted to stay and hear Phil’s concert. I and other members of the campus chapter of Students for a Democratic Society wrote letters asking Phil to change the date. No answer. In desperation — oh, how it cut my heart out — we organized a boycott of his records.

Then, of course, his manager (his brother, Mich­ael) was quick to respond. “Go ahead, attack the heavies in the movement if it makes you feel better,” he wrote in an open letter printed in Statesman, the official student paper. But they did move up the date to October 20, the evening before the march. Phil was interviewed on WUSB radio, Kenny Brom­berg’s show. “Who’s this creep Mitchel Cohen who’s telling everyone to boycott my records?” Phil raged.

October 21. The huge anti-war demonstration in Wash­ing­ton D.C. swept past the Lincoln Memorial and over the Memorial bridge into Virginia, wave after wave of anti-war warriors crashing against the walls of the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman and dozens of anti-warriors dressed in sackcloths played trumpets and encircled the world’s biggest “edifice complex” trying to raze Jericho’s walls and levitate the building.

One-hundred-thousand people — some carrying signs depicting their town’s opposition to the war against Vietnam, their unions, churches, campuses — inched up to the line of soldiers standing shoulder to shoulder pointing their rifles at our chests, their unsheathed bayonets glinting in the after­noon sun like a thousand points of fright.

I remember it as vividly as the infamous sunrises over the Woodstock music festival in 1969, the Bread and Puppet festivals in Vermont years later, and the incredible sunsets in New York City the week following 9-11: The man carrying the hand-made sign: “Lyndon Johnson pull out, like your father should have.” The chants, “Hey hey LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?” The young woman who in a moment of artistry danced in-and-out of the line of soldiers as thousands of voices sang “join us,” inserting flowers into the barrels of their rifles. Soon, a dozen people joined her. “Flower Power,” East Coast style!

As the afternoon wore on, word of a “sit-in” spread like wildfire through the enormous crowd, and hundreds began climbing ropes tied to a parapet overlooking a set of huge doors, just beyond the soldiers’ reach. The sit-in was blocking one of the en­trances. The Pentagon was no longer unassailable! Yea, and in high school gym I couldn’t climb the ropes to save my life. Oh well. Try anyway.

I’d man­aged to drag myself up a few yards when a hand grabbed one of my legs. I panicked, tried to kick it away without losing my grip, but it wouldn’t let go.

“Uh-oh, this is it, they’re going to arrest me,” I thought, my first arrest. I kicked frantically, tried to get away. Finally, in panic, I looked down and saw my father yanking me back and my mother scream­ing: “Where do you think you’re going?”

“What are you doing here?” They came to protest too. “How did you find me? I’ve gotta join the sit-in, all my friends are up there.”

Indeed, my friends from Stony Brook SDS were already up on the ledge. Even a professor from Stony Brook, Mike Zweig, was sitting-in.

“You have to let me go. I helped organize the buses!” I shouted, as though that compelling point would clinch the argument.

The frustrated and embarrassed tears al­ready’d begun spilling down my cheeks. “No way. You’re exhausted, get down right now.”

Continue reading »

A RESPONSE TO CHRIS HEDGES: VIOLENCE, TACTICS, REVOLUTIONARY STRATEGY & OCCUPY WALL STREET

This essay is available as a hardcopy booklet. Please drop an email to MitchelCohen@mindspring.com to obtain a copy.

Note: I was not going to comment further on Chris Hedges’ widely published essay, “The Cancer in Occupy,”1 concerning tactics for Occupy Oakland (and by extension Occupy Wall Street). In that article, Hedges condemned tactics he attributed to the Black Bloc at the January 28, 2012 “Move-In Day” march where, according to one of many similar reports,2 Occupy Oak­land unsuccessfully attempted to take over the long disused Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center with the intent of convert­ing it into a community center. The peaceful protest of 2,000 was disrupted by police firing tear gas, smoke and pepper bombs into the crowd. It ended with police “kettling” marchers in a public park and in front of a YMCA. But after Hedges appeared on May Day on Democracy Now! and renewed his condemnations without reflecting at all on what folks in Occupy had been saying to him, I decided to publish this here.

Chris Hedges has and continues to make valuable and often blistering critiques of what he calls “corporate cap­i­talism,” and the role of both the Democratic and Repub­lican parties in crushing civil liberties, enacting imperial­ist wars and ravaging the planet in the service of the 1 percent. He is an inspiring ally (and, strangely, “not a member,” in his own words) of the Occupy Wall Street movement. But he has zero experience as part of a radical organization or even an affinity group, and it shows, especially when it comes to how to address differences of opinion and other concerns within a movement.

In fact, Hedges exhibits tremendous disdain for left move­ments that don’t conform to his increasingly moralistic mold. His book, Death of the Liberal Class, “is one of the worst misreadings of history by an acclaimed writer on the Left that I’ve ever seen,” says Brian Tokar, a veteran participant in nu­merous direct action campaigns and also a professor at the In­sti­tute for Social Ecology and of environmental studies at the Uni­ver­sity of Vermont. “Hedges honestly believes that the New Left accomplished almost nothing, except for some key figures he likes, such as How­ard Zinn and the Berrigans.”

In Death of the Liberal Class, Hedges (incredibly, to me) condemns the New Left for having “no political vision.”

Continue reading »

ALEXANDER COCKBURN’S MEMORIAL, & WBAI

Eight years ago I’d proposed to Bernard White, former Program Director at WBAI, that we invite Alexander Cockburn — probably the greatest and most fascinating left columnist of our time — to broadcast a regular column on WBAI.

Bernard said, “interesting idea”, and proceeded to do absolutely nothing about it.

I nevertheless followed up by contacting Alex, whom I knew from many adventures and considered a friend. (He considered me, as he wrote in a column a decade ago, one of his “favorite anarchists” — a mis-label, true, but one I nevertheless refused to wash off.)

Alex said he’d be delighted to broadcast on WBAI, and asked that I let him know definitively, as he was about to make commitments on other projects. I reported this to Bernard White, but …. nothing.

I’d left out the story of how, in early April 1989, I had invited Alex Cockburn and Utrice Leid — at that time an editor of the Brooklyn-based City Sun — to speak at Stony Brook University on Long Island, as part of the Red Balloon Collective’s “Revolution in the Revolution” speakers’ series. No one in the Collective had a car, and so I was to meet our illustrious speakers at the railroad station, which at that time resembled something out of “Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid.”

I then expected to proceed on foot across the remains of a once-upon-a-time glorious forest (a decade earlier many students “expanded our consciousness” there. We were crushed when the university bulldozed the forest to construct the headquarters of the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation on that site), the 2/3rds of a mile across the athletic fields, and finally through the maze of buildings to the lecture hall where they’d be speaking.

Of course, nothing ever goes exactly according to plan, let alone one so fraught with potential glitches. Our Collective tried to build into everything we did a sort of “planning for chaos”, which almost always wreaked havoc. In this instance, both Alex and Utrice arrived on the same train, thankfully, but they didn’t know each other and they disembarked at opposite ends.

And, did I mention that it was a blizzard?!

The fields were a gooey mess, and the university had recently built fences near the path (which was, at any rate, covered over by snow and mud). We decided to climb over the fences to avoid a longer (but saner) route. Thigh-deep in snow, Alex and I managed to hop right over, but Utrice got sort of stuck. We helped her over, at last.

Utrice braved it in fine spirit, and the three of us fell into an interesting discussion for the next 30 minutes on “identity politics” vs. “class politics” in the midst of all the mud and blizzard, the wet winds blasting in our face. We finally arrived an hour later than planned, exhausted and soaked, to a packed auditorium and very appreciative audience.

When Tony Bates became interim Program Director at WBAI three years ago, I again broached the subject of airing commentaries following (or as part of) the evening news. I met with Tony and gave him a list of 5 or 6 people who would make outstanding columnists for WBAI. Alexander Cockburn was at the top of the list.

Tony had some very good skills with regards to pitching on the air, but knowing anything about the Left, its radical history and its great intellectual tradition was not among them. And worse, he wouldn’t listen to those of us who did know, and who volunteered to contact folks like Alex Cockburn or Glen Ford on behalf of the station.

Fifteen years earlier, Laura Flanders occasionally interviewed her uncle (yes, Alex Cockburn was Laura’s proud uncle!) on her show. But WBAI — out of sheer stupidity — would never feature Alexander Cockburn or provide regular access for this most stunningly wide-ranging and incisive radical voice. Cockburn would regularly eviscerate Empire in his weekly “Beat the Devil” column in the Nation and delighted in slicing up the “sacred cows” on the Left as well, and his writings had influenced two generations of activists — but management could not make room for his rapier wit and scathing commentary on WBAI’s renowned and finely-tuned humor-filled schedule. (ahem!)

Now Alex is gone. He died two months ago, though the fruits of his life’s work continue in the pages of CounterPunch, a new book about to go to press, and with the young brood of radical journalists he nurtured.

Gone, too, is the opportunity for him to make “improvements” in his asinine denunciations of so-called “conspiracy theorists” regarding global climate change, the Kennedy Assassination, and 9/11 Truth. Nevertheless, unlike most editorialists, he welcomed comment and debate. I’d been debating him for years on those issues, and felt I was making headway.

I attended a memorial service for Alexander Cockburn last week in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Many Left luminaries spoke and shared stories and pictures of Alex, including (in person) Tariq Ali, Najla Said (daughter of Edward Said), Laura Flanders, JoAnn Wypijewski, Alex’s famous brothers (Andrew and Patrick) and daughter Daisy, and Noam Chomsky. Ralph Nader appeared via video’d message.

Among the crowd, I recognized four people from the Brooklyn Greens, even more from the ActionGreens listserve I moderate, where we occasionally post and discuss Alex Cockburn’s essays, and many from the Nationbut no one — not a single individual — from WBAI’s staff, local board or management.

Such is the pity! WBAI is the worse for wear because of its series — since the death of Samori Marksman in 1999 — of (at best) do-nothing and ignorant Program Directors and management. I can only hope that WBAI’s new Program Director, Chris Hatzis, will break from that awful tradition and add, as regular columnists, today’s sharpest radical critics and ecologists.

Alex Cockburn may no longer physically inhabit this mortal coil, but his writings live on. Even those columns of thirty years ago — with proper artistic enunciation (and denunciation), as evidenced at his Memorial by the enjoyable and witty recitations of his finest essays — would still, today, comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, and provide the kind of panache, political scorecard and literary sweep so needed in our media, including, especially, WBAI.

I’m keeping my fingers crossed and I’m holding my breath … but, perhaps like Alex Cockburn, I’m already turning blue.

Mitchel Cohen
Outgoing Chair, WBAI Local Station Board

STOP THE PESTICIDE SPRAYING, EVERYWHERE!

Guest Post by CATHRYN SWAN

WASHINGTONSQUAREPARKBLOG.COM

The Alleged “Cure” Is Worse Than The Disease: Why NYC Ought to Stop Spraying Toxic Pesticides — Central Park/Upper West Side to Be Sprayed

Should we be killing lady bugs?

My first foray into grassroots activism in New York City was in year 2000 when I first became aware of the mass pesticide spraying being conducted to allegedly stop the spread of West Nile virus. I read an article in the New York Times about the effects this spraying would have on the ecosystem, down to the smallest insects. I later learned about the problems the pesticide had on human health but honestly it was the wildlife and the insects that first got my attention and my concern.

I went to a meeting and immediately became involved in the No Spray Coalition and, for the last 12 years I have been involved, through our lawsuit against the City of New York, media work, organizing, and on-the-ground activism.

Year 2000: Pesticide spraying of pregnant women and kids on streets of Harlem – video shown in federal court and all news channels

Via the No Spray Coalition’s attempt to get a TRO (temporary restraining order) to STOP the spraying in 2000, that year in federal court, our lawyers showed footage (shot by two volunteers who followed the trucks) of one of the spray trucks careening through Harlem with its toxic brew covering kids, a pregnant woman, people walking out on the street with no warning. That evening, this footage and news of the law suit was shown on every New York City news channel. Continue reading »

PLEDGE: OCCUPY STUDENT DEBT CAMPAIGN

This statement is a result of collective work by the Occupy Student Debt Campaign, which is seeking 1 million student debtors to pledge not to pay their student debt once 1 million others also make that pledge.

- Mitchel

Please Repost

www.occupystudentdebtcampaign.org

A Statement from the Occupy Student Debt Campaign

Everybody is now talking about the student debt crisis, but nothing is being done about it.

Thanks in large part to the great public amplifier of the Occupy movement, this year’s presidential contenders have been forced to embrace student loan reform as a talking point in their respective campaigns. But the debt relief being pushed by the Obama administration is a token gesture, aimed at getting some traction on the youth vote — especially the more disillusioned or alienated student constituencies. Recent bills introduced in Congress — Student Loan Forgiveness Act (H.R. 4170) and the Private Student Bankruptcy Fairness Act (H.R. 2028) — have zero chance of passing in anything like their current form. Practically speaking, no reform program of any substance is on the legislative horizon, least of all one that would regulate the predatory lending practices of Wall Street banks. Continue reading »

Guest Post: Federal court enjoins NDAA. An Obama-appointed judge rules its indefinite detention provisions likely violate the 1st and 5th Amendments

By Glenn Greenwald

A federal district judge today, the newly-appointed Katherine Forrest of the Southern District of New York, issued an amazing ruling: one which preliminarily enjoins enforcement of the highly controversial indefinite provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act, enacted by Congress and signed into law by President Obama last December. This afternoon’s ruling came as part of a lawsuit brought by seven dissident plaintiffs — including Chris Hedges, Dan Ellsberg, Noam Chomsky, and Brigitta Jonsdottir — alleging that the NDAA violates “both their free speech and associational rights guaranteed by the First Amendment as well as due process rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

The ruling was a sweeping victory for the plaintiffs, as it rejected each of the Obama DOJ’s three arguments: Continue reading »

WE ARE THE 39 PERCENT! (and that’s huge, for New York)

In the NY Times, Clyde Haberman asked about the Park Slope Food Coop referendum: “Why is Israel singled out for economic ostracism and not China, the ruthless occupier of Tibet and a denier of fundamental human rights to its own people?”

There are several answers:

1) Israel claims to speak in the name of all Jews everywhere — including me. I support the boycott of Israel because I refuse to allow the fact that I’m Jewish be used by the Israeli government as a ruse rationalizing the horrors that State is perpetrating against the Palestinian people. Not in my name!

2) Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. foreign military aid. Its war machine is propped up by our tax dollars ($27 billion in last 10 years). Thus, we have an added responsibility to speak out against Israel’s egregious policies and our own government’s as well.

3) I, and most others at the Coop, are most certainly involved in other campaigns for labor, human, social justice and environmental rights.

The resolution proposed to the Park Slope Food Coop contained two issues wrapped up in one: Democracy at the Food Coop, and whether to boycott products from Israel.

Rabbi Andy Bachman explicitly argued to deny that all members be polled: “Some issues are not for everyone to vote on. This is one of them.”

I beg to differ. Continue reading »

Remembering Rachel Corrie. (No words, today)

Rachel Corrie: April 10, 1979 - March 16, 2003

 

Click HERE to watch Rachel’s last public interview.